Sunday, December 30, 2007

Israel has been "afflicted by a non-nation and a loathsome people"

. . . since the military victory in 1967, the governments of Israel have turned away from its roots and identity; they have spurned the nation’s birthright. As part of Israel’s retreat from these historical imperatives, from itself, since September 2000 the Arabs have engaged in Jew-killing and pillage that cripples prosperity and seems to make peace a pipe dream. Indeed, so perverse are our times that in regard to Israel and the Jews settled there, "peace" has been defined as the expulsion of Jews from Judea and Samaria overseen by a long-time hero of the IDF. Moreover, the Executive Branch of Israel’s "best friend,’ America, particularly its State Department is committed to creating a terror state named Palestine in the heartland of Israel and airbrushing from history 3700-years of Jewish presence and worship there, airbrushing, too perhaps, the West’s indebtedness to Israel. And if that means cutting America off from its own roots, well, that is essential to fashioning a "Brave New World.’

* * *
. . . the State and people of Israel have been ‘in the wilderness’since then [1967], led by "a government of fools" that chases the mirage of peace through alienation rather than grasping the joys of identity, settlement, abundance and sovereignty. And so Israel has been "afflicted by a non-nation and a loathsome people," a rabble whose "nationhood’ may be the greatest political fraud of a century of horrible frauds by which "the past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, and the lie became truth." But, as Eidelberg often has written, the historical function of this non-nation, the "Palestinians’ was to prevent Jews from forgetting who they are and to remind them that only by grasping and fulfilling their entire mission and morasha will they secure its rewards.

excerpt from
A Jewish Philosophy of History by Paul Eidelberg
Reviewed by Dr. Eugene Narrett
Examining God’s Plan: A Book Review of A Jewish Philosophy of History

About the reviewer…

Eugene Narrett earned his BA, MA, and PhD from Columbia University in New York City. During the past twenty-five years he has been teaching literature, philosophy and art in the Boston area and has written extensively on culture, politics, and art. He currently Directs and teaches in the Baccalaureate Program in Multidisciplinary Studies at Cambridge College.

More about Israel, "Land for Peace," and the futility of creating a "'Palestinian' State"

Two excerpts

Links for full texts given at end

The Camp David formula “land for peace,” the basis of the forthcoming Annapolis Summit, is rooted in an erroneous and fatal assumption. That certain Arab leaders agree to negotiate with Israel on the basis of this formula has induced politicians in Israel and abroad to regard such Arabs as “moderates.” This assumption stands in striking contrast to principles of statecraft enunciated by Prince Metternich, the great 19th century Austrian statesman on whom Henry Kissinger wrote his doctoral dissertation.

According to Metternich, “to base one’s conduct in an important undertaking on faith in the moderation of one of the contracting parties is asking for trouble … to build on air, to gamble the future on one throw.” This faith animated Shimon Peres and Yossi Beilin, the architects of the disastrous Oslo or Israel-PLO Agreement of 1993. The same faith animates Benjamin Netanyahu’s insistence on “reciprocity” when dealing with Arab leaders. It was this historically unfounded faith that led him to sign the Wye River Memorandum, which surrendered large areas of Judea and Samaria to Yasser Arafat—a major step toward an Arab Palestinian state.

As Metternich saw, to expect the leaders of a dictatorship (such as the Fatah- or Hamas-led Palestinian Authority) to be moderate is like asking them to destroy the foundation of their existence.


“The idea of creating another Arab state in addition to the 21 already in existence, has no chance to survive. The creation of a Palestinian state will only bring chaos and steps toward it have not brought any good to Palestinians on the ground,”

Saturday, December 22, 2007


"In protecting the lives and rights of her citizens, America smashed the infrastructure of Islam's indoctrination machine; empowering Muslims to break the chains of ideological tyranny and drown out the exhortations of the stultifying past as codified in the discredited koran. ahadith, and sunnah."
--from "In your Dreams" (an imaginary stab into the future that could yet happen)

Actually it is a takeoff on "Gifts from Heaven": The Meaning of the American Victory over Japan, 1945 by John David Lewis

where it reads:

"In protecting the lives and rights of her citizens, America smashed the infrastructure of Japan’s sacrificial indoctrination machine; this empowered tthe Japanese to break the chains of tyranny and to drown out the discredited exhortations of the suicidal past."

Saturday, December 15, 2007


(to governments)

fjordman** writes:

The purpose of the state is to uphold law and order and maintain the nation’s borders and territorial integrity. Western European* governments are doing neither, yet are busy with political censorship and interfering with details of our private lives where they have no business.

It’s time they are reminded that they are our servants, not our rulers. If they will not fulfill their duties, they need to be replaced by somebody who will.

The warning here is to the governments. The people--the inhabitants of the countries, not the so-called "immigrants"--will stand for their governments's inability or unwillingness to stop the advances and excesses of the alien ideology (Islam) just so long. As soon as our people stop being bedazzled by what is happening around them, they will act. We here at this blog--plus all the anti-jihadist blogs in the internet***, big or small--will see to it that the people are awakened and that any government unwilling to bend to the will of the people will be replaced--one way or another.
*The United States is not lagging far behind--as concerns maintaining the nation’s borders and territorial integrity. Although rapes of our women is neither as permissible nor as prevalent as in Europe, especially in Scandinavia and France, the viciousness and intractability of Islam is little undertood not even by the people who pretend to have read the koran (Glenn Beck, for example). Whether by the pressure of their employers (Glenn Beck works for CNN) or by having been given and read expurgated korans (where the hateful--of "infidels"--passages have been made palatable by "interpretation of the original Arabic" probably being given as the explanation. Neither the government, the main stream media, nor the majority of candidates vying for the next U.S. presidency show much understanding of the danger of Islam to our way of life, our system of government, and our civilization. may they all heed the warning given above.

The noted blogger Fjordman filed this report via Gates of Vienna.

***See for the incomparable najistani's list of anti-jihadist blogs.