Politics Add comments Is Zero a fascist dedicated to destroying the life savings of Americans, or is he criminally incompetent?
The answer is yes.
So let me tell you about Gao Xiqing (gow shee-ching). He’s one of the smartest Chinese you’ll ever meet (and that’s saying something). Graduate of Duke law school, worked at a major Wall Street law firm, returned to his native China to direct the CIC, China Investment Corp., the Chicoms’ trillion dollar sovereign wealth fund.
In other words, he’s the guy who owns $700 billion of US Treasurys, the guy who Zero is depending on to keep buying. Should he not show up at the next Treasury auction, the dollar disintegrates the next day.
A friend of mine has gotten to know him (don’t ask me how). “Gao is super-smooth, sophisticated, speaks English as good as you or me, and knows America inside and out,” he says. “He can talk the language of high finance and international capitalism as good as anyone - yet he is a hard core Chinese Communist who regards America as China’s enemy. He despises Obama as the epitome of American weakness.”
Gao also thinks that gold is going to $5,000 an ounce.
No, the Chicoms aren’t going to buy up the world’s gold supply. That would artificially ramp up the price for little consequence - after all, the world’s total gold production is about 2,500 tons a year or (at $1,000 per troy ounce; 12,000 ounces per ton) worth some $30 billion. A pittance with trillions at stake.
What it does mean is that Gao thinks the dollar’s goose is cooked, thanks to Zero.
He’s not alone. A UN panel is going to recommend ditching the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. John Paulson, whose huge hedge fund made 37% last year by understanding the mortgage crisis, is pulling out of stocks and is into gold (particularly gold mining companies).
Millions of investors agreed today (3/19), shooting gold up $70 after the Fed announced it was creating another $1.5 trillion out of thin air.
I really, really hope you are nodding your head right now and saying, “I sure am glad To The Point told me about bullionvault.com and I put my money into gold.”
Well, if you didn’t - don’t freak out. Just move fast now. Gold is just getting started.
What makes this so evil is the flip side. What is also just getting started is the life savings and fixed-income pensions of tens of millions of Americans being wiped out.
Right along with dollar deflating against gold (and oil, above $51) today, it did the same with the euro, the yen, and the pound - which should be ridiculous, because the EU, Japan, and UK economies are in the tank more than ours. Again, this is just the start.
But it is not just the start of the destruction of our wealth, it is the destruction of our freedom - for to destroy one, you must destroy the other. We are seeing the start of an orgy of anti-capitalist envy-mongering. The phony outrage over AIG, for example, is only a hint of what’s to come.
What is said privately by businessmen among themselves must be said publicly, such as: “Barney Frank and Chris Dodd should be lined up against a wall and shot by a firing squad.” Preferably to their face at a Congressional hearing.
The Liberal Fascist modus operandi, typified by Frank and Dodd forcing banks to provide subprime mortgages to people who were poor credit risks, is to create a problem by interfering in the market. Then pretend outrage at the problem they created and demand more interference, more rules and regulation and power to solve it - which of course makes the problem worse.
This is on purpose - for the cycle can be repeated, gaining more power with each cycle.
While conservatives are interested in wealth creation, liberals are into wealth seizure. While conservatives want freedom, liberals want power. Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and the current President of the United States are fascist thieves.
Let’s cut to the chase. We cannot afford to wait until 2010, much less 2012. We haven’t got the time. The Democrat Fascist cycle of wealth destruction is accelerating too fast.
There are two growing protest movements: the Tea Party taxpayer revolt movement and the “Birther” movement that demands Zero prove he is a natural-born US citizen. These two must merge.
Far from a tin foil hat cause, Birthers are simply asking that Zero provide his actual birth certificate, which he won’t - at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.
Since all he has to do is provide the same thing all the rest of us do to get a driver’s license or passport, and he won’t, this is prima facie evidence that he can’t. Or there is some scandalous secret he is covering up - such as his real father is not a Kenyan but a radical left black poet his mother was having an affair with, Frank Marshall Davis.
In any regard, until he provides solid proof of his natural born citizenship, we are justified in regarding his presidency as illegitimate.
This argument must be made at every Tea Party protest. We do not recognize him as president until he proves he legitimately, Constitutionally is.
Folks, this may get very ugly, real brown shirt fascist ugly, real fast. The economy, the dollar, employment, our life savings and pensions, may collapse real fast. Maybe not, but the odds are accelerating.
The silver lining is that the lying, the incompetence, the corruption, the purposeful wealth destruction is also coming at us so fast and so obviously that the veil is being lifted from the eyes of more and more people every day. Witness Zero’s falling approval polls. Soon it will reach a tipping point and fall off the polling cliff.
When that point is reached, the Tea Party/Birther protests must reach a crescendo making one demand and one only: We want him to resign.
By that time - three months, six months, less than a year from now at the outset - the chaos, tax revolts, civil disobedience, violence from Zero’s brown shirt supporters, impoverishment of millions, et al, will make the country ungovernable. He must resign. It is the only solution. He must resign. There is no other way to start correcting the situation. He must resign.
Yes, that means President Biden. Fine. As stupid and goofy as Biden is, he isn’t malicious, he isn’t out to impoverish America as a conscious goal. Stupid is better than evil.
He must resign. America cannot afford to wait until 2012 to rid itself of the Evil of Zero.
More from Dr. Jack Wheeler
Religion of Envy: The Evil Eye—Why Europe is probably doomed
http://www.tothepointnews.com/component/option,com_seyret/Itemid,148/task,videodirectlink/id,1/
Share with others to save the Humanity:
Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
from http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/03/23/the-evil-of-zero/
Monday, March 23, 2009
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Are we at war with Islam?
Hugh Fitzgerald of Jihad Watch asks this vital question in . . .
Fitzgerald: Are we at war with Islam?
Jihad Watch's Hugh Fitzgerald considers the common claim by Muslim leaders that the West is at war with Islam:
The more accurate formulation would be: the adherents of Islam, following correctly its tenets, as expressed in the Qur'an and Hadith, and in the example of Muhammad set out in the Sira, have been making war, whenever and wherever possible, and employing whatever instruments at the time are available (combat, wealth, "pen, tongue," and now demography) to spread Islam, to prevent non-Muslims from setting up any obstacles to the further spread and ultimate dominance of Islam, and to ensure that any non-Muslims permitted to remain alive without being forcibly converted will, nonetheless, have to live lives of deliberate humiliation, degradation, and physical insecurity. During some long periods when Islam was weak, and the awareness of the outside world also feeble, the only kind of Jihad that was practiced against the outside world were expeditions by slavers and looters to Western Europe (a million whites seized, and many villages destroyed, over several centuries, Eastern Europe and Russia -- several million victims, including Circassian and Georgian and other Christian women seized for their noted beauty), and to Africa (tens of millions of black Africans, mostly young males castrated at the point of seizure, and then marched overland, and then taken often by sea for part of the journey, to the slave markets of Islam: Jeddah, Constantinople, Damascus, Cairo, Baghdad, Algiers, Constantinople, even as far as Ottoman-ruled Smyrna). The mortality rate was 90%.
That has been the history of Islam's relations to all non-Muslims. Conquest, destruction, slavery, demands from within the lands conquered for jizyah. It is little different today, though disguise is of the essence. The Bumiputra system used against Hindus and Chinese in Malaysia is simply a disguised jizya tax by the Malaysian Muslims. Yet Muslims now demand foreign aid from Infidel states, and act as if it is theirs by right and must not either be stopped or have any strings attached to it: see the fury of the P.A. over the American Congress's attempt to funnel aid through American aid agencies; see the Egyptian government's complacent belief that no matter what it did to secretly help Iraqi weapons projects, no matter what nuclear projects it is up to itself, no matter how completely it ignores its solemn commitments under the Camp David Accords, and becomes instead a world center of antisemitism, no matter how much anti-Americanism its people display in that most hostile of countries, it will still continue to receive, for no conceivably sensible reason, some $2 billion a year from American taxpayers, apparently helpless to prevent their government from paying what has now become a jizyah tax, just like all the others we pay to every Muslim country that does not have oil revenues.
Islam is at war with Buddhists in Thailand and in Burma, and at war with Confucians and atheists in China. It is at war with Hindus in Bangladesh, and Pakistan, and Kashmir, and India itself. It is at war with Christians in the Philippines, and in Indonesia, and in Malaysia, and in Bangladesh, and in Pakistan, and in Iran, and in Saudi Arabia, and in Iraq, and in Lebanon, and in Egypt, and in Algeria. Islam is at war with whatever Jews can be found, in and out of Israel, since so very few remain, after years of persecution and murder, within the lands ruled by Muslim Arabs. Islam is at war with everyone, for Islam divides the world between Believer and Infidel. Anyone who reads and re-reads the Qur’an, and then reads the commentators, and the jurisconsults, and the muhaddithin, and then looks at the history of Islamic conquest -- reading, for example, "The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam" which is perhaps Bat Ye'or's greatest work of history -- and then looks at Muslim attitudes and behavior today, can come to only one conclusion: Muslims are at war with, and remain a permanent danger to, all non-Muslim societies. If some are not fervent in their Islam, we still do not know what might set off such fervency. Those who place such abstract principles as "tolerance" and "pluralism" above the reasonable need to preserve civilizations, such as our own, which first created and promoted such principles, against those who do not in truth believe in those principles and in the long run would destroy them and the civilization that developed them, are wrong. Lincoln was not the first, nor the last, to understand that in war-time, the same measures do not necessarily apply as during peace-time.
Those who see things aright, and who have taken the trouble to study Islam, know that this war can be contained, and that it need not involved large-scale military conflict. But that conflict can be avoided, across national borders, and within the borders of European nations, only if Muslim countries and groups are kept from acquiring major weaponry, or forced to disgorge what they have, and are kept from migrating in greater numbers to the West (they have little desire to go elsewhere), and those here limited in their sinister campaigns of Da'wa (in which Islam is not fully spelled out until, for the convert, he or she has already signed up for the Army of Islam), which are aimed first at the most marginal and therefore most vulnerable populations -- marginality defined as both economic and psychic.
Far from making war on Islam, the United States has repeatedly rescued Muslims in Kosovo and Bosnia, extended aid for decades to Turkey and Iran, always been prompt to offer other kinds of aid (the aid post-tsunami rushed to Aceh, the most Muslim part of Indonesia), protected Muslim Kuwait and even-more Muslim Saudi Arabia from Saddam Hussein (a choice that looks, in retrospect, not quite as obviously right as it once did), and continues to give aid, against its own best interests, to Pakistan (a recipient for decades of American military and political support), to Egypt, and to the "Palestinian" Authority. And of course tens of billions, even hundreds of billions, have been spent to rescue the Iraqis from their own latest Lord of Misrule, and to build up the country -- all the while taking casualties because of the inability of Iraqis to do the job themselves. They are unable to fight for their own country though there are 25 million of them. So very few of them capable of feeling, among the rumors and lies and crazed through-the-prism-of-Islam perceptions of the universe, any real or lasting gratitude to American infidels - precisely because they are infidels.
Muslims make war, with or without military means, because Islam itself is suffused with a war-like and aggressive doctrine. Refusal to see this does not make the doctrine go away. Imaginary "Muslim moderates" who are then imagined to be a "majority" do not make the texts of Qur'an, Hadith, and Sira change. They do not make the massacre of the Banu Qurayzah prisoners disappear. Or the assassination of Asma bint Marwan. Or the attack on the Khaybar Oasis. Or little Aisha. Or a hundred other events in Muhammad's life, Muhammad who is uswa hasana, in the Qur'anic phrase, the very model for all Muslims, for all time.
Islam makes war and calls it "peace" and "justice." From a Muslim perspective, of course, this is perfectly true. Islam brings with it a pax islamica, and the "justice" of Islam. Quite right. No Muslim should really disagree.
But those of us who have made the choice not to accept Islam, and who find that the more we discover about it, the more horrified we become (and let's face it: a few years ago, we knew almost nothing about it, and were prepared, for example, to assume that the last word on the subject might be, for the more naive, John Esposito, and at a slightly lesser level of naivete, Bernard Lewis). Now we have studied, and are trying as best we can to get others to study. It would even be nice if a few journalists, before offering their platitudes and plongitudes, at least admitted they knew little about Islam. It would be nice if the cheerleaders of the "Light-Unto-the-Muslim-Nations" Project in Iraq would stop to consider and even study the nature of Islam, and begin to ask themselves if Iraq is not in fact the obvious place, almost a god-given place, to exploit -- merely by leaving, for nothing more is called for -- the fissures between Arab and non-Arab Muslim, between Sunni and Shi'a. And then to concentrate on preventing the islamization of Europe -- not by throwing Israel to the wolves, which is the hollow and self-defeating strategy of the Alastair-Crooke-and-Patrick-Seale variety, urged on by the deplorable men now in charge of the E.U. bureaucracy and foreign policy, but by waking Europeans up to the betrayal, by their own elites in the government and the press, of the long-term interests of the indigenous Infidels.
Again, this sentence is either true or false:
"The large-scale presence of Muslims within Western Europe has already made the lives of the indigneous Infidels, and non-Muslim immigrants as well, far more unpleasant, expensive, and physically dangerous than they would have been without such a large-scale Muslim presence."
No one, not even those who utter such silly and despairing phrases as "but what can we do? what can we do now?" can deny the truth of that easily verifiable remark.
Verify it yourself. Talk to Europeans. Walk around the streets of European cities. Find out the cost of monitoring Muslims, at train stations and bus stations, at metro stations and at airports, at chemical plants and at nuclear plants. At churches, and at synagogues, and at Hindu and Buddhist and Sikh temples. And parliaments. And city halls. And police stations. And fire stations. And schools, beginning with, but hardly limited to, the Jewish schools. And of course those spies in the mosques, those wire-taps, those agents who must be paid, and the police, and the security guards, and the lawyers, and the judges, and the whole apparatus that grows and grows, only to monitor a problem that need not ever have been allowed to be created, much less be permitted to continue to grow because leadership is lacking, the articulation of the problem is seldom to be heard.
And of course, the United States must watch Western Europe carefully, and its own Infidels learn from the unhappy experience of France, and Belgium, and Germany, and England, and Spain, and...well, fill in the names yourself.
And draw the right conclusions yourself.
Posted by Robert [Spencer] at May 10, 2005 7:55 AM
Fitzgerald: Are we at war with Islam?
Jihad Watch's Hugh Fitzgerald considers the common claim by Muslim leaders that the West is at war with Islam:
The more accurate formulation would be: the adherents of Islam, following correctly its tenets, as expressed in the Qur'an and Hadith, and in the example of Muhammad set out in the Sira, have been making war, whenever and wherever possible, and employing whatever instruments at the time are available (combat, wealth, "pen, tongue," and now demography) to spread Islam, to prevent non-Muslims from setting up any obstacles to the further spread and ultimate dominance of Islam, and to ensure that any non-Muslims permitted to remain alive without being forcibly converted will, nonetheless, have to live lives of deliberate humiliation, degradation, and physical insecurity. During some long periods when Islam was weak, and the awareness of the outside world also feeble, the only kind of Jihad that was practiced against the outside world were expeditions by slavers and looters to Western Europe (a million whites seized, and many villages destroyed, over several centuries, Eastern Europe and Russia -- several million victims, including Circassian and Georgian and other Christian women seized for their noted beauty), and to Africa (tens of millions of black Africans, mostly young males castrated at the point of seizure, and then marched overland, and then taken often by sea for part of the journey, to the slave markets of Islam: Jeddah, Constantinople, Damascus, Cairo, Baghdad, Algiers, Constantinople, even as far as Ottoman-ruled Smyrna). The mortality rate was 90%.
That has been the history of Islam's relations to all non-Muslims. Conquest, destruction, slavery, demands from within the lands conquered for jizyah. It is little different today, though disguise is of the essence. The Bumiputra system used against Hindus and Chinese in Malaysia is simply a disguised jizya tax by the Malaysian Muslims. Yet Muslims now demand foreign aid from Infidel states, and act as if it is theirs by right and must not either be stopped or have any strings attached to it: see the fury of the P.A. over the American Congress's attempt to funnel aid through American aid agencies; see the Egyptian government's complacent belief that no matter what it did to secretly help Iraqi weapons projects, no matter what nuclear projects it is up to itself, no matter how completely it ignores its solemn commitments under the Camp David Accords, and becomes instead a world center of antisemitism, no matter how much anti-Americanism its people display in that most hostile of countries, it will still continue to receive, for no conceivably sensible reason, some $2 billion a year from American taxpayers, apparently helpless to prevent their government from paying what has now become a jizyah tax, just like all the others we pay to every Muslim country that does not have oil revenues.
Islam is at war with Buddhists in Thailand and in Burma, and at war with Confucians and atheists in China. It is at war with Hindus in Bangladesh, and Pakistan, and Kashmir, and India itself. It is at war with Christians in the Philippines, and in Indonesia, and in Malaysia, and in Bangladesh, and in Pakistan, and in Iran, and in Saudi Arabia, and in Iraq, and in Lebanon, and in Egypt, and in Algeria. Islam is at war with whatever Jews can be found, in and out of Israel, since so very few remain, after years of persecution and murder, within the lands ruled by Muslim Arabs. Islam is at war with everyone, for Islam divides the world between Believer and Infidel. Anyone who reads and re-reads the Qur’an, and then reads the commentators, and the jurisconsults, and the muhaddithin, and then looks at the history of Islamic conquest -- reading, for example, "The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam" which is perhaps Bat Ye'or's greatest work of history -- and then looks at Muslim attitudes and behavior today, can come to only one conclusion: Muslims are at war with, and remain a permanent danger to, all non-Muslim societies. If some are not fervent in their Islam, we still do not know what might set off such fervency. Those who place such abstract principles as "tolerance" and "pluralism" above the reasonable need to preserve civilizations, such as our own, which first created and promoted such principles, against those who do not in truth believe in those principles and in the long run would destroy them and the civilization that developed them, are wrong. Lincoln was not the first, nor the last, to understand that in war-time, the same measures do not necessarily apply as during peace-time.
Those who see things aright, and who have taken the trouble to study Islam, know that this war can be contained, and that it need not involved large-scale military conflict. But that conflict can be avoided, across national borders, and within the borders of European nations, only if Muslim countries and groups are kept from acquiring major weaponry, or forced to disgorge what they have, and are kept from migrating in greater numbers to the West (they have little desire to go elsewhere), and those here limited in their sinister campaigns of Da'wa (in which Islam is not fully spelled out until, for the convert, he or she has already signed up for the Army of Islam), which are aimed first at the most marginal and therefore most vulnerable populations -- marginality defined as both economic and psychic.
Far from making war on Islam, the United States has repeatedly rescued Muslims in Kosovo and Bosnia, extended aid for decades to Turkey and Iran, always been prompt to offer other kinds of aid (the aid post-tsunami rushed to Aceh, the most Muslim part of Indonesia), protected Muslim Kuwait and even-more Muslim Saudi Arabia from Saddam Hussein (a choice that looks, in retrospect, not quite as obviously right as it once did), and continues to give aid, against its own best interests, to Pakistan (a recipient for decades of American military and political support), to Egypt, and to the "Palestinian" Authority. And of course tens of billions, even hundreds of billions, have been spent to rescue the Iraqis from their own latest Lord of Misrule, and to build up the country -- all the while taking casualties because of the inability of Iraqis to do the job themselves. They are unable to fight for their own country though there are 25 million of them. So very few of them capable of feeling, among the rumors and lies and crazed through-the-prism-of-Islam perceptions of the universe, any real or lasting gratitude to American infidels - precisely because they are infidels.
Muslims make war, with or without military means, because Islam itself is suffused with a war-like and aggressive doctrine. Refusal to see this does not make the doctrine go away. Imaginary "Muslim moderates" who are then imagined to be a "majority" do not make the texts of Qur'an, Hadith, and Sira change. They do not make the massacre of the Banu Qurayzah prisoners disappear. Or the assassination of Asma bint Marwan. Or the attack on the Khaybar Oasis. Or little Aisha. Or a hundred other events in Muhammad's life, Muhammad who is uswa hasana, in the Qur'anic phrase, the very model for all Muslims, for all time.
Islam makes war and calls it "peace" and "justice." From a Muslim perspective, of course, this is perfectly true. Islam brings with it a pax islamica, and the "justice" of Islam. Quite right. No Muslim should really disagree.
But those of us who have made the choice not to accept Islam, and who find that the more we discover about it, the more horrified we become (and let's face it: a few years ago, we knew almost nothing about it, and were prepared, for example, to assume that the last word on the subject might be, for the more naive, John Esposito, and at a slightly lesser level of naivete, Bernard Lewis). Now we have studied, and are trying as best we can to get others to study. It would even be nice if a few journalists, before offering their platitudes and plongitudes, at least admitted they knew little about Islam. It would be nice if the cheerleaders of the "Light-Unto-the-Muslim-Nations" Project in Iraq would stop to consider and even study the nature of Islam, and begin to ask themselves if Iraq is not in fact the obvious place, almost a god-given place, to exploit -- merely by leaving, for nothing more is called for -- the fissures between Arab and non-Arab Muslim, between Sunni and Shi'a. And then to concentrate on preventing the islamization of Europe -- not by throwing Israel to the wolves, which is the hollow and self-defeating strategy of the Alastair-Crooke-and-Patrick-Seale variety, urged on by the deplorable men now in charge of the E.U. bureaucracy and foreign policy, but by waking Europeans up to the betrayal, by their own elites in the government and the press, of the long-term interests of the indigenous Infidels.
Again, this sentence is either true or false:
"The large-scale presence of Muslims within Western Europe has already made the lives of the indigneous Infidels, and non-Muslim immigrants as well, far more unpleasant, expensive, and physically dangerous than they would have been without such a large-scale Muslim presence."
No one, not even those who utter such silly and despairing phrases as "but what can we do? what can we do now?" can deny the truth of that easily verifiable remark.
Verify it yourself. Talk to Europeans. Walk around the streets of European cities. Find out the cost of monitoring Muslims, at train stations and bus stations, at metro stations and at airports, at chemical plants and at nuclear plants. At churches, and at synagogues, and at Hindu and Buddhist and Sikh temples. And parliaments. And city halls. And police stations. And fire stations. And schools, beginning with, but hardly limited to, the Jewish schools. And of course those spies in the mosques, those wire-taps, those agents who must be paid, and the police, and the security guards, and the lawyers, and the judges, and the whole apparatus that grows and grows, only to monitor a problem that need not ever have been allowed to be created, much less be permitted to continue to grow because leadership is lacking, the articulation of the problem is seldom to be heard.
And of course, the United States must watch Western Europe carefully, and its own Infidels learn from the unhappy experience of France, and Belgium, and Germany, and England, and Spain, and...well, fill in the names yourself.
And draw the right conclusions yourself.
Posted by Robert [Spencer] at May 10, 2005 7:55 AM
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/006100.php
Monday, March 2, 2009
Remembering the 12 Nepalese murdered by the Moslems in 2004
from In honour of 12 Nepalese Hindu brothers
http://dharmaveer.blogspot.com/2009/02/in-honour-of-12-nepalese-hindu-brothers.html
Saturday, February 28, 2009
This post is in honour of the 12 Nepalese of Hindu Dharma who were beheaded by Islamic fiends in Iraq in September 2004. I had thought about linking the video of this beheading to this post because I want people to know just what kind of ideology we are up against. We are not fighting a civilized foe. We are fighting a foe who revels in their brutality, who profanes every single thing civilization is about, and who is absolutely fanatically wedded to our destruction. Of course, Hindus have known this since 712AD, but somehow we still tend to need reminding from time to time.
In the end, I decided against linking to the video because I think it is more important that we remain true to Hindu Dharma. We cannot drop to the level of these barbarians. We must fight them, but in a manner that is consistent with our Dharma.
Here is what the group that beheaded our Hindu brothers said:
“We have carried out the sentence of God against 12 Nepalese who came from their country to fight the Muslims and to serve the Jews and the Christians … believing in Buddha as their God”
This is entirely in accordance with Islamic teachings. In particular, Kuran 9:5 orders Muslims to "slay idolators where ever ye find them.." and to "smite their necks." This is what was done to our Nepalese brothers.
Though I did not link to the video, you can find it on the internet by googling "Nepalese beheading video." Before you do so, please be warned that the video is extremely disturbing.
But so is Islam.
Saturday, February 28, 2009
Posted by Dharmaveer at 11:52 AM
and
from How to Stop Islamization DRASTIC TIMES CALL FOR DRASTIC MEASURES
comes this take on the murders:
Let me point out another recent [written in 2005] incident
As you know muslims in Iraq have been kidnapping and beheading foreigners
About 3 months ago, they beheaded 12 Nepalese hindus
In response, muslims in Nepal got a 'Gujurat type reprisal'( about 30000 Nepalese muslims got ethnic cleansed by Nepalese hindu mobs)and no more Nepalese have been kidnapped in Iraq
Whereas they non-stop behead western hostages
http://islamicdanger4u.blogspot.com/2008/02/how-to-stop-islamization-drastic-times.html
http://howtostoptheislamicjihad.blogspot.com/2008/04/how-to-stop-islamization-drastic-times_21.html
http://dharmaveer.blogspot.com/2009/02/in-honour-of-12-nepalese-hindu-brothers.html
Saturday, February 28, 2009
This post is in honour of the 12 Nepalese of Hindu Dharma who were beheaded by Islamic fiends in Iraq in September 2004. I had thought about linking the video of this beheading to this post because I want people to know just what kind of ideology we are up against. We are not fighting a civilized foe. We are fighting a foe who revels in their brutality, who profanes every single thing civilization is about, and who is absolutely fanatically wedded to our destruction. Of course, Hindus have known this since 712AD, but somehow we still tend to need reminding from time to time.
In the end, I decided against linking to the video because I think it is more important that we remain true to Hindu Dharma. We cannot drop to the level of these barbarians. We must fight them, but in a manner that is consistent with our Dharma.
Here is what the group that beheaded our Hindu brothers said:
“We have carried out the sentence of God against 12 Nepalese who came from their country to fight the Muslims and to serve the Jews and the Christians … believing in Buddha as their God”
This is entirely in accordance with Islamic teachings. In particular, Kuran 9:5 orders Muslims to "slay idolators where ever ye find them.." and to "smite their necks." This is what was done to our Nepalese brothers.
Though I did not link to the video, you can find it on the internet by googling "Nepalese beheading video." Before you do so, please be warned that the video is extremely disturbing.
But so is Islam.
Saturday, February 28, 2009
Posted by Dharmaveer at 11:52 AM
and
from How to Stop Islamization DRASTIC TIMES CALL FOR DRASTIC MEASURES
comes this take on the murders:
Let me point out another recent [written in 2005] incident
As you know muslims in Iraq have been kidnapping and beheading foreigners
About 3 months ago, they beheaded 12 Nepalese hindus
In response, muslims in Nepal got a 'Gujurat type reprisal'( about 30000 Nepalese muslims got ethnic cleansed by Nepalese hindu mobs)and no more Nepalese have been kidnapped in Iraq
Whereas they non-stop behead western hostages
http://islamicdanger4u.blogspot.com/2008/02/how-to-stop-islamization-drastic-times.html
http://howtostoptheislamicjihad.blogspot.com/2008/04/how-to-stop-islamization-drastic-times_21.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)